Twenty years ago today, on September 1, 2006, Lionsgate dropped a Labor Day weekend action movie into 2,515 theaters on a $12 million budget. Crank packs 88 minutes of action and never once lets the audience sit down.
Jason Statham plays Chev Chelios, a Los Angeles hitman poisoned with a synthetic drug that kills him the moment his heart rate drops. To stay alive, he has to keep his adrenaline pinned. That is the entire engine of the movie.
It worked. Crank grossed $42.9 million worldwide against that $12 million budget, per Box Office Mojo, and got a sequel three years later.
The Shoot Was as Reckless as the Movie
First-time directors Mark Neveldine and Brian Taylor skipped 35mm entirely, shooting on Canon XL2 camcorders and a Sony CineAlta HDC-F950, with each man running his own camera. The signature shots came from Neveldine, who strapped into rollerblades and skated through the action with the camera in his hands. It was nowhere near as nimble as it looked. Promoting the 2009 sequel, Neveldine told Collider that on the original Crank they were hauling “62-pound backpacks with hard decks tethered to our cameras.” That’s how the film caught Statham piloting a motorcycle through downtown Los Angeles in a hospital gown, and why the footage lurches, whips, and reframes mid-punch.
Statham did his own fighting and driving, including a fight staged roughly 3,000 feet over Los Angeles aboard a helicopter, and he has been blunt about why he insists on it. “There’s so much faking that goes on, I just feel like the audience gets cheated a little bit,” he told MovieWeb during the film’s press run. He draws exactly one line. “I’m very confident when I’m relying on my own physical capabilities for stunt work,” he said, “but when you’re putting your life in a machine’s hands, that’s where I get a little bit uncomfortable.”
Twenty Years On, It Still Rips
The math still looks absurd. Crank opened to $10.5 million over the three-day weekend, finishing second behind Invincible, and closed its domestic run at $27.8 million. For scale, Variety reported that MPAA member studios spent an average of $65.8 million per film that year, and The Hollywood Reporter put the average marketing spend on a single movie at another $34.5 million.
Reviews split in 2006 and never came back together: a 62% Tomatometer from critics against a 71% Popcornmeter from audiences on Rotten Tomatoes, where the consensus still concedes that the film’s “assaultive style and gleeful depravity may turn off casual action fans.”
The lists have been kinder. Collider ranks Crank ninth on its Best R-Rated Action Movies of the 2000s, ahead of Man on Fire and behind Inside Man, calling it “one of its decade’s most absurd and bombastic action films.” Statham was 39 that September, four years out from the first Transporter and still best known stateside as a Guy Ritchie ensemble player. Crank stripped away the scaffolding and left only what American audiences actually wanted from him.
Go to Source
Author: Jenny Lynton

