You may want to check your freezer. A recall has been issued for frozen pizzas and focaccia bread sold by the major retailers Trader Joe’s, HelloFresh, and Meijer, due to fears over metal fragments.
Which Frozen Pizzas Are Affected
A photograph showing empty store shelves in the frozen food aisle.
Photo by Matthew Horwood/Getty Images
The Food and Drug Administration (F.D.A.) has announced that certain frozen pizzas and focaccia products sold by several retailers are the subject of an ongoing voluntary recall. A total of 25,000 cases of those items were named in the recall. The following list of products were all included:
Hello Fresh Basil Pesto & Mozzarella Pizza
Lot Code 20367483 and Use-By Date June 29, 2026
Lot Code 20367483 and Use-By Date June 30, 2026
Lot Code 20377537 and Use-By Date Sept. 4, 2026
Lot Code 20377821 and Use-By Date Sept. 5, 2026
Frederik’s by Meijer Slow Roasted Tomato & Parm Focaccia
Lot Code 20359045 and Use-By Date April 27, 2026
Lot Code 20360217 and Use-By Date April 28, 2026
Lot Code 20367746 and Use-By Date July 3, 2026
Lot Code 20373614 and Use-By Date Aug. 3, 2026
Trader Joe’s Focaccia Bread Roasted Tomato & Parm
Lot code 20366937 and Use-By Date July 26, 2026
Lot 20367144 and Use-By Date July 27, 2026
Lot 20367326 and Use-By Date July 28, 2026
Lot 20367484 and Use-By Date July 29, 2026
Lot 20369659 Use-By Date Aug. 11, 2026
Lot 20370576 Use-By Date Aug. 13, 2026
Fresh & Simple Roasted Tomato Parmesan Focaccia
Lot Code 20370988 and Use-By Date July 19, 2026
The affected products have been confirmed to have been shipped to stores in the following states:
Arizona (AZ)
California (CA)
Connecticut (CT)
Florida (FL)
Illinois (IL)
Michigan (MI)
North Carolina (NC)
New Jersey (NJ)
Texas (TX)
Virginia (VA)
Why the Recall Was Issued
The recently recalled frozen food items were manufactured by the Charlotte, North Carolina, company Bakkavor. People are being warned not to consume the products due to the possibility that they may contain metal fragments in slow-roasted tomatoes that were used as ingredients.
The recall initially was issued on January 19, but it has been upgraded in recent days. This is now classified as a Class II recall. The website for the F.D.A. explains how serious the possible effects of a recall of that level can be.
“Class II recall: a situation in which use of or exposure to a violative product may cause temporary or medically reversible adverse health consequences or where the probability of serious adverse health consequences is remote.”
What to Do If You Bought These Products
Anyone who believes they have one of the affected pizzas or focaccia products in their freezer is first and foremost being instructed to not eat it. Instead, they should return it to the retailer they purchased it from for a refund. In the case of HelloFresh, they are being asked to contact customer service to seek their refund.
Star Wars producer Kathleen Kennedy was one of the few skeptics at the Runway AI Summit, where AI was compared to fire and the printing press just a week after Sora’s death.
This is not a good time for NFL teams in need of a franchise quarterback. The 2026 draft class is thin. Scouts are mostly unimpressed. And some are already counting the days until the 2027 draft when a half-dozen QBs could end up with first-round grades. For teams that need help now, though, the cupboard isn’t completely bare. There are good quarterbacks in this class if teams look hard enough. You can expect that a number of clubs will, given that at least a handful of them are still searching for a long-term answer at QB. The 2026 prospects just might need a little extra time, patience and care. “There are 3-4 guys in this class that I think will have good NFL careers,” one scout told me. “Do I think any of them will be great? No. They’re not ‘can’t-miss’ (prospects). But there’s talent there if you know what to do with it.” So, who are the quarterbacks who could be “good”? I talked to seven scouts to get their insights on the five best in the class — what they like about them, what they need to work on and where they might end up. 5. Drew Allar, Penn State Expectations were high for Allar heading into the 2025 season, but he struggled early and then broke his left ankle in mid-October. It made for a disappointing end to a weird college career that never really rose to the heights many anticipated for a guy with such obvious physical tools. He was good as a junior (3,327 yards, 24 touchdowns, 8 interceptions in 16 games), but regressed as a senior (1,100 yards, 8 touchdowns, 3 interceptions in six games). The injury only complicated his outlook. He finished with 26 starts in college. Draft range: Round 3-4. “If a quarterback with his size is still sitting there when Day 3 starts, someone is going to jump up (to trade for him),” one scout told me. Height/weight: 6-foot-5, 228 pounds Scout takes: “My overall evaluation is that he’s good, but probably should have been better. He’s got great size and I love his arm (strength). His mobility is good. His accuracy is good, but inconsistent. There’s obviously a lot to work with there, but he was up and down his entire college career. … He was regressing as a senior before the injury. That’s a big red flag, especially after his interceptions jumped (as a junior) when they opened the playbook for him. But a guy that big who can throw like that? A lot of teams are going to want a piece of that. … If his career was a straight line, he might be a first-rounder based on talent and potential. But he was so all over the place. And it was easy to forget about him after the injury.” Pro comp: Josh Allen, Joe Flacco. “Same general scouting report as those guys (coming out of college): Big body, big arm, but an erratic arm,” one scout told me. “If he figures it out, he’s got Pro Bowl upside. If he doesn’t, he’s Drew Lock.” Biggest strength: Size. Every scout I spoke with raved about his size and strength, and great size can really matter for an NFL quarterback. “If you get a guy that big who can really play, you are set for a very long time,” one scout told me. Biggest question mark: Accuracy, or lack of it. He completed just 59.9% of his passes in his breakout sophomore year. That jumped to 66.5% as a junior, but so did his interceptions (from 2 to 8). Then, as a senior, his completion percentage dipped to 64.8%, and he was picked off three times in his six games. “It was all over the place,” one scout told me. “That’s worrisome since the sample size was big.” Best fit: Los Angeles Rams. “They’re so loaded they can afford to take a shot on him on Day 2,” one scout told me. “He’d be a steal for Sean McVay. There’s so much talent, but it has to be coached right. Watch McVay turn him into a Pro Bowler in 3-4 years.” 4. Carson Beck, Miami He was aiming to declare for the 2025 draft, but after a down season and the need for surgery on a torn UCL in his right elbow, he decided to transfer to Miami and give it one more year. He was outstanding for the Hurricanes, completing 72.4% of his passes for 3,813 yards, 30 touchdowns and 12 interceptions, and leading them on an improbable run to the CFP final. He started three full years between Georgia and Miami, throwing for 11,239 yards, 82 touchdowns and 30 interceptions. He started a whopping 43 games in college. Draft range: Rounds 3-4. “He’s a Day 3 guy,” one scout told me, “but the lack of quarterbacks gives him a shot to go Day 2.” Height/weight: 6-5, 233 Scout takes: “He’s got the look of a classic, big, strong, pocket passer. When he sets and throws, the ball just jumps out of his hand. That was even better before his elbow surgery. It didn’t have the same jump last season, and maybe it doesn’t come back. But that’s still his gift. … He can be rattled. I don’t know if it’s mental or a physical thing, but he’s susceptible to pressure. He doesn’t move well and when things are off schedule he’s not the same. … Last year was a big step up for him mentally. He looked like he was in more command of his offense and made better decisions. But the physical part took a dip. His throws weren’t the same. … He gets a lot of passes batted at the line of scrimmage for a guy his size. It’s not all his fault, but it’s still weird.” Pro comp: Mac Jones, Kenny Pickett. Neither are a perfect comparison. Pickett had more mobility and Jones wasn’t pressured as much at Alabama. But they are big, pocket passers who can wilt when the pass rush comes. “The upside to guys like that is they can play like Eli Manning,” one scout told me, “but they can’t process nearly as well as him.” Biggest strength: Arm strength and pocket presence. As the scouts said, his arm isn’t what it used to be, but he can still fire the ball a long way and throw it hard. That’s especially true when he’s comfortable in the pocket. Biggest question mark: Play under pressure. When the pass rush throws him off schedule, things can go wrong fast. “His decision-making when he’s rushed isn’t always good,” one scout told me, “and the zip in his fastball can disappear, too.” Best fit: Detroit Lions, San Francisco 49ers. “He looks a little like Jared Goff, even though he doesn’t have his talent,” one scout told me. “But that Lions offense is the kind that he needs, with a strong running game and good line.” Another scout added: “Look what Kyle Shanahan did for Mac Jones. (Beck) is the same type of player. And (Shanahan) doesn’t need his quarterbacks to run.” 3. Garrett Nussmeier, LSU Considered by many to be one of the top quarterbacks heading into the 2025 season, his prospects were dimmed by an injury-marred season. He had an abdominal/core muscle injury that left him with “a stabbing pain in my ab every time I went to go throw,” he said at the NFL Scouting Combine. He still threw for 1,927 yards and 12 touchdowns with five interceptions in nine starts. But that was way off his 2024 season — 4,052 yards, 25 touchdowns, 12 interceptions. He made 23 starts in college. Draft range: Rounds 3-4 Height/Weight: 6-2, 203 Scout takes: “It’s a shame about the injury because I really thought he was the No. 1 guy in the class going into the season. He’s got such a strong arm. He’s generally pretty accurate. But the injury took it all away. He never looked like himself. … He’s a gunslinger, with all the good and bad that comes with that. When he’s on and healthy, he can make some incredible plays. But guys who play like that also make some really big mistakes. … If that injury was as bad as he says, it shows a heck of a lot of toughness to play through it.” Pro comp: Baker Mayfield. Two scouts mentioned the No. 1 overall pick of the 2018 draft. “Baker was much better in all areas,” one scout told me. “But the style of play was the same.” Another scout added: “You have to go way back, but you know who I really think of when I see him? Tony Romo. There’s a lot of talent there. You just have to reign him in.” Biggest strength: His arm. He might not have the strongest arm in the draft, but one scout told me he “can deliver big throws from a bunch of different arm angles.” Another scout added: “He thinks he can make every throw, because he probably can.” Biggest question mark: Questionable decision-making, at times. It’s the boom-or-bust reality of a “gunslinger.” As one scout told me, “He likes to take risks. That’s fine. But it doesn’t always work out. You have to live with that with guys like him.” Best fit: Pittsburgh Steelers. “He looks like (Mike) McCarthy’s kind of quarterback,” one scout told me. “He’s not on the same level as (Aaron) Rodgers or (Dak) Prescott, but the style and ability to play on the move is the same.” The Steelers, of course, need a franchise quarterback to groom for when (or if) the 42-year-old Rodgers retires. Also, Garrett’s father, Doug, was McCarthy’s quarterbacks coach in Dallas for three seasons. 2. Ty Simpson, Alabama He bucked the transfer trend of this era and stayed at Alabama for four years, waiting his turn to play. His patience finally paid off when he earned the starting job last season and was very good on a CFP team, completing 64.5% of his passes for 3,567 yards, 28 touchdowns and just five interceptions. He also carried ‘Bama through a tough schedule, before fading down the stretch. He also made just 15 career starts in college. Draft range: Low first round or second round Height/weight: 6-1, 211 Scout takes: “Boy, does he need another year (in college). I like everything about him, but he’s not ready. He’s got to go to a team that has a starter and can take the time to work with him. If they do, he’s got the tools to be good. But he doesn’t have the experience to play right now. … He’s really smart and has a good arm, but he seems to think it’s better than it is. He thinks he can make every throw, but he can’t. … He’s tough and doesn’t like to give up on a play. But he’ll run himself into trouble trying to figure it out. That’s inexperience. … He’s a good mover, but not really a runner. He can scramble out of trouble, but doesn’t always know what to do once he does. He ends up holding the ball too long.” Pro comp: Brock Purdy. “He’s a better prospect (than Purdy),” one scout told me, “but the point is that he’s got the tools, and if the right guy develops him, he’ll be good.” Biggest strength: His accuracy. Scouts told me he didn’t seem to make a lot of mistakes with his decisions and ball placement, and that’s not easy against SEC defenses. Scouts also pointed to his four-week stretch against Georgia, Vanderbilt, Missouri and Tennessee, all ranked in the top 16 at the time. Simpson averaged 267 passing yards and threw nine touchdowns and just one interception in that stretch, while Alabama went 4-0. “That was a big-boy stretch,” one scout told me, “and he was big-time.” Biggest question mark: He’s inexperienced. “You just can’t find many successful NFL quarterbacks who only had 15 college starts,” one scout told me. “It’s a huge risk.” Best fit: Arizona Cardinals. Several scouts noted Simpson would be a good system fit for the Rams, which would make him the same for new Cardinals coach Mike LaFleur, the former Rams offensive coordinator. They wouldn’t take him at No. 3 overall, though, so they’d have to consider trading back into the first round, probably into the low 20s, or hope that he falls to them at No. 34. One sleeper possibility: The Steelers at No. 21, since Mike McCarthy knows QBs and Aaron Rodgers can’t play forever. 1. Fernando Mendoza, Indiana The reigning Heisman Trophy winner and national champion, he’s coming off a storybook season. In his one season with the Hoosiers, after transferring from Cal, he threw for 3,535 yards and completed 72% of his passes in 16 games, throwing 41 touchdowns and just six interceptions. He ran for 276 yards and seven touchdowns, too. He’s the clear cream of this crop. Draft range: Presumptive No. 1 overall pick (Las Vegas Raiders) Height/weight: 6-5, 236 Scout takes: “He’s the best quarterback in this class by far, but it’s not a good class. He would’ve been third (among QBs) last year and probably fifth or sixth (in 2024). … He’s a great kid and a strong leader. He comes off a little goofy, and I don’t know how well that’ll play (in the NFL), but his teammates seem to want to follow him. … He is so smart and so accurate. He can really thread the needle. If you give him time in the pocket, he can pick apart a defense. But that’s the key. You’ve got to give him time. He can’t move. … He needs to be behind a strong offensive line. He’s not going to create off schedule. I’m not sure Vegas is the best place for him.” Pro comp: The three names that came up the most were Jared Goff, Kirk Cousins and Matt Ryan — smart, pocket passers with limited mobility. “Goff had a better arm,” one scout told me. “Mendoza is more accurate than Goff was (in college), though. And he’s a much better prospect than Cousins was, but the style is similar.” Biggest strength: His accuracy and intelligence. Scouts raved about how he placed his throws in perfect spots, showing a remarkable ability to read defenses and his receivers’ intentions. It made up for what many told me was “average” arm strength. “If you look at his film,” one scout told me, “you’re not going to find many mistakes.” Another scout attributed that to “perfect” mechanics. Biggest question mark: His ability to move in the pocket and create off-schedule plays. His completion percentage dipped last season to 53.2% outside the pocket. He has trouble escaping pressure and doesn’t show the same arm strength when he’s not set. “That’s a real problem going to a bad team,” one scout told me. “He needs things perfect, and they won’t be.” Best fit: It’s a moot point because the Raiders will pick him No. 1 overall, even though one scout told me, “that might be the worst fit for him.” Another scout added: “Too bad he won’t drop to the middle of the first round. I’d love to see what a guy like (Vikings coach Kevin) O’Connell could do with him.”
It was just December 14, 2025, when beloved and highly-regarded actor/director Rob Reiner and his wife, Michele Singer Reiner, were murdered in their home. While their son Nick is currently suspected of committing the heinous act and is standing trial, he’s officially entered non-guilty pleas.
Given Rob and Michele’s stature in Hollywood, it comes as no surprise that they were beloved by many actors, directors, and producers in the TV and film industry. Case in point, Oscar-winner Jamie Lee Curtis was a longtime friend of the Reiners. Curtis recently sat down with Former First Lady Michelle Obama and her brother Craig Robinson for their IMO Podcast to discuss the shocking death of the Reiners and how grief was even more complex to navigate for her due to her daughter, Annie.
The Reiners Were the Godparents of Jamie Lee Curtis’ Daughter
Director Rob Reiner (R) and wife Michele Singer Reiner attend the wedding celebration of Paul Katami And Jeff Zarrillo on June 28, 2014 at The Beverly Hilton Hotel in Beverly Hills, California.
(Photo by Barry King/FilmMagic)
In an emotionally charged part of the discussion with Obama and Robinson, Curtis talks about the “greatest gift” is having children and having the “privilege of raising them.” That’s when she makes the revelation that the Reiners were Annie’s godparents and actually died on her birthday. Specifically, fighting back tears, Curtis stated:
“The greatest gift is a child, and getting the privilege of raising them and learning how to help someone through their life. And my husband and I became grandparents to our eldest daughter and her husband. And their baby boy was born in December. And it was a week after Rob and Michelle. And Rob and Michelle are her [Annie] godparents, and they died on her birthday. And my beautiful daughter, who loved them, as we all did, managed to be able to metabolize that grief and sadness, as we have all had to do.”
The tender moment was overall just a brief part of the interview. Curtis also discussed her time in Hollywood, her thoughts on her Oscar-winning role in Everything Everywhere All at Once, and more. You can check out the full interview below.
It wouldn’t be an episode of First Take if Stephen A. Smith wasn’t calling out someone in the sports world. On Wednesday, the longtime ESPN personality turned his focus to Tiger Woods.
In the wake of Woods’ March 27 arrest on suspicion of DUI, Smith took aim at Woods’ decision to eschew hiring a driver out of concerns over “privacy” and admonished the golf legend for putting people’s lives at risk by “being behind the wheel of a vehicle inebriated.”
Smith also theorized that Woods “must have a very suspect life” if he is trying to hide something from a driver.
‘Damn that privacy’
Woods blew a 0.00 on a breathalyzer at the scene but refused a urine sample and told police in Jupiter Island, Florida he had taken pain medications earlier in the day. Two loose hydrocodone pills were found in the 50-year-old’s pocket.
According to a PEOPLE source, Woods, who was previously charged with DUI in 2017 and has a history of car accidents, refuses to hire a driver because he “doesn’t want anyone to watch over him or know what he is doing,” and “he think he is fine to drive.”
That’s not good enough for Smith.
“Damn that privacy. I don’t give a damn what you worried about,” Smith said , via the New York Post. “You must have a very highly suspect life that you as a billionaire don’t even want to hire a driver. Something wrong. Something with that. You want your privacy. Privacy from what? What’s the driver gonna do? Because he dropped you off at some place he’ll know where he dropped you off? I mean, damn. What are you trying to hide?
“The point is a rhetorical question because I don’t care and none of us should care, it’s not our business. What is our business is you staying away from being behind the wheel of a vehicle when you’re inebriated.”
Smith later told Woods he was “lucky you didn’t kill somebody, if not yourself.”
Tiger taking time away
Woods pleaded not guilty to charges of misdemeanor DUI with property damage and refusal to submit to a lawful test. He also waived his arraignment hearing, which had been scheduled for April 23.
On Tuesday night, the 15-time major champion announced he was taking time away from golf in order to “prioritize my well-being and work toward lasting recovery.”
“I know and understand the seriousness of the situation I find myself in today. I am stepping away for a period of time to seek treatment and focus on my health,” Woods said in a statement. “This is necessary in order for me to prioritize my well-being and work toward lasting recovery/
“I’m committed to taking the time needed to return in a healthier, stronger, and more focused place, both personally and professionally. I appreciate your understanding and support, and ask for privacy for my family, loved ones and myself at this time.”
The offseason and spring training are behind us, but there is plenty of MLB news left to cover now that the season is here. Here are the noteworthy transactions, injuries and more from the 2026 MLB season: Apr. 1 Lodolo making rehab start Reds pitcher Nick Lodolo is expected to throw 60-65 pitches during a rehab assignment on Thursday. The left-hander, who is on the injured list due to a blister on his left index finger, will make his rehab start for Single-A Daytona against Jupiter in a Florida State League game. If Lodolo has a successful outing, he could join the Reds’ rotation during next week’s series at Miami. Lodolo was 9-8 with a 3.33 ERA and 156 strikeouts last season. Left-hander Caleb Ferguson (right oblique strain) threw from 90 feet on flat ground before Wednesday’s game against the Pittsburgh Pirates. He is expected to accompany the team on their upcoming seven-game road trip to Texas and Miami. Red Sox catcher scratched Wednesday Red Sox catcher Carlos Narvaez was scratched from Boston’s finale with Houston on Wednesday for an undisclosed reason. Narváez was removed from the lineup about 2.5 hours before first pitch and replaced behind the plate by Connor Wong. “I just made a change,” manager Alex Cora told reporters. “I talked to Carlos a little bit and we move on from there. So, it’s one of those that I felt like we needed to make the change in the lineup. And I think it’s for the best.” When pressed if Narváez’s removal from the lineup was for a disciplinary reason, Cora didn’t directly answer the question. “Let’s keep it between me and Carlos,” Cora said. “And he understands. This is something that happens on every club. It just happens to be early in the season, and I think it’s the right thing to do.” The 27-year-old Narváez is hitting .444 in three games this season. He is in his second season in Boston after beginning his career with the Yankees. Mar. 31 DeLauter exits after injury Cleveland Guardians right fielder Chase DeLauter left the game in the first inning after fouling a pitch from Los Angeles Dodgers starter Shohei Ohtani off his back foot Tuesday night. After a trainer came out to check on DeLauter, the rookie took a few practice swings and returned to the batter’s box. He tried to run out a grounder to third, but was thrown out and then hobbled to the tunnel. He was diagnosed with a left foot contusion. X-rays were negative. DeLauter was replaced by CJ Kayfus in the bottom of the first. DeLauter was the American League rookie of the week after hitting four home runs in his first three games. He’s just the second player to accomplish the feat, joining Trevor Story of the Colorado Rockies in 2019. Umpire loses track of count in Red Sox-Astros Plate umpire Mark Wegner acknowledged he lost track of the count during Cam Smith’s nine-pitch walk Tuesday night in the fifth inning of the Houston Astros’ 9-2 win over the Boston Red Sox. In fact, Smith should have been out on strikes after the third pitch. Smith swung and missed at two cutters from Red Sox starter Brayan Bello to begin the plate appearance. After the second pitch, Joey Loperfido stole second base and Christian Walker scored on the play thanks to a throwing error by catcher Connor Wong. After about 40 seconds, Smith swung and missed at a sweeper. That should have been strike three but Wegner, a crew chief working his 29th major league season, flashed 1-2 for the count. Six pitches later, Smith worked a walk. “I just watched the video. I didn’t know what happened until I came in here and apparently, I somehow didn’t count the second swinging one because I said the count was 1-2. It was actually strike three,” Wegner told a pool reporter after the game. “Had anybody caught it, we can always go and call replay and check the count. I’ve never done that before. I’m not happy about it. Just made a mistake.” Wegner said no one on the field raised an issue in the moment. Bello said Wegner gave the count as 1-1 after his second pitch, and he didn’t question it at the time. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
No doubt, the bench press is one of the most popular exercises in the gym. Trying to snag a bench on International Chest Day is tougher than finding a parking spot at the gym during the first week of January. Part of the appeal is just how many variations you can implement to build a well-rounded, superhero-like upper body.
Take the incline barbell bench press, for instance. According to exercise scientist Mike Israetel, PhD, of Renaissance Periodization, a well-controlled incline bench press with a moderate-to-wide grip is one of the most elite and underrated exercises for growing the pecs.
“If you do this exercise with good technique, you do it with a pause, and you get stronger at it for sets of 10 to 15 for months at a time, your upper chest is likely to experience growth,” he shared with Men’s Journal. “That’s based on all the biomechanical inference we have, and based on the experience of very many people—including myself.”
A traditional bench press primarily targets the chest, front shoulders, and triceps. Setting the bench to an incline of at least 30 degrees shifts more of the workload to the upper portion of the chest. But grip width also plays a big role in which muscles are most activated. A wider grip, for instance, increases shoulder abduction, bringing the front shoulders more into the picture. That said, the chest remains the primary driver. Medium to wide grips tend to activate the pecs most effectively, allowing you to produce the most force during the lift.
Set an incline bench to about 30 to 45 degrees, lie back, and assume a grip that’s wider than shoulder width on the barbell. Keep your feet planted and chest up before unracking.
Lower the bar under control to your upper chest, keeping your elbows flared slightly out and wrists stacked over your elbows throughout the descent.
Press the bar back up in a straight path until your arms are fully extended, and return back to the start position with control.
In a time when the best sneakers could easily go for three-digit prices, it’s nice to see a name-brand favorite under $50. And that’s exactly what we’re seeing right now at Nordstrom, where an ’80s-style shoe’s modern re-release is getting a discount of up to 40%.
The Puma Palermo Leather Sneaker is now selling for as low as $48, a price that has clearly landed with consumers. Though this is a “New Markdown” in the eyes of Nordstrom, it already appears like something that’s been shopped over, with select sizes already displaying low stock notices. We’re not at all surprised, either. For years, the Adidas Samba has been one of the most trendy sneakers for men. It only makes sense that this similar-looking shoe from Puma—the brand founded by the brother of the founder of Adidas—is getting this kind of attention.
Puma Palermo Leather Sneaker, From $48 (was $85) at Nordstrom
Materials: Leather upper, textile lining, rubber sole
Best Use Case: A casual yet stylish sneaker that looks great for everyday wear.
This is a well-built shoe with a streamlined top that still pulls off the retro charm with ease. Where something like the New Balance 574 dives headfirst into chonky textures and fuzz, the Palermo gives off primarily relaxed and sleek vibes, with highlights of thickness via suede overlays and soft, beefy laces. Another distinguishing mark of the shoe is the gold-lettered Puma Palermo tag on the side of the shoe.
Style-wise, we’d call the Puma Palermo an ’80s throwback shoe, but it traces its roots even farther back to the days of the classic German Army Trainer (GAT) style, immediately noticeable by the brown rubber mid and outsole and compact upper.
The Puma Palermo also bears a strong resemblance to the Nike Killshot 2 (imagine the white highlight as a “Swoosh”), a popular release that—alongside the Palermo—has had so many releases and rereleases that it becomes hard to tell who influenced whom. Ultimately, this is a shoe style that just keeps winning.
The Puma Palermo Leather Sneaker is just $48 while this deal lasts, but sizes may not be around much longer. Grab one while you can.
When NASCAR introduced the new Chase system and got rid of the win-and-in element to its postseason, there was the thought that drivers might not make bold moves or crew chiefs might not take chances because of the new points system. And in some ways, fans can argue that has happened. Crazy moves for the win where the leaders crash? Haven’t seen it. But at least for one Cup race, that wasn’t the case. Chase Elliott’s team made a relatively bold decision to pit twice instead of once in the final stage, putting it in position to be a couple of laps down if the caution came out at the wrong time. Bubba Wallace appeared to let the frustration get to him as he turned Carson Hocevar (Wallace said in his television interview he misjudged it) and ended up wrecking himself out of the race. Both moves resulted in huge point swings. Elliott ended up with the win and a boatload of points. If he had lost a couple of laps, he possibly would have finished with around 15 points instead of 55. Wallace was the big loser, finishing with one point while Hocevar finished with 20. Just how much of a difference does that make? A difference of 40 points would have dropped Elliott from fourth to eighth in the standings. A difference of 19 points would have put Wallace from tied for eighth to sixth in the standings. Drivers and teams need to weigh these possibilities more in the new points system, where regular-season standing could make or break whether a driver qualifies for the Chase and how much of a shot that driver has at a championship. In the past, risking it on fuel mileage to get the win (and the automatic playoff berth or the playoff points) made sense, even if it cost 20-30 regular-season points. In the past, going off the strategy could win a race but if things don’t go the needed way, it could cost 10-20 points. In this system, teams and drivers need to make methodical and deliberate decisions. There is only one problem with that: They are competitors in race cars. That isn’t a recipe for methodical and deliberate for every occasion. Has the new points system made it so that a driver doesn’t make a crazy move for the win on the final lap? Possibly. And while that is a shame for the highlight reel or the water cooler talk, it probably adds to what fans view as the legitimacy of the racing. In past years, there was so much “don’t hate the player, hate the game” that NASCAR opted to change the game. But as long as there is a trophy available and fenders on the cars, there will be teams that roll the dice for a win and there will be drivers who make silly moves out of frustration. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing — unless you’re the driver losing points. The dramatic moments now will be more natural. Such as banking on the caution not coming out (or that history says it will come out). Such as getting into a wreck that is probably avoidable. Did the drivers do the right thing? It’s pretty obvious from the result in the points whether the choice was good or bad. And it shows that no matter the system, human nature and race cars can create drama.