Go to Source
Author:
Walmart Sells an $80 Rattan Patio Set That Includes 2 Chairs and a Tempered Glass Side Table
Men’s Journal aims to feature only the best products and services. If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission. Prices are accurate and items in stock at time of publishing.
In This Story
Why We Love This Deal
Affordable patio sets under $100 tend to cut a corner somewhere (usually the frame), which is why so many end up wobbly and rusted after a year. Walmart’s latest markdown keeps the steel frame intact and just knocks down the price instead, so now you can get this 3-piece patio set with a tempered glass table for half off.
Normally priced at $160, the Lacoo 3-Piece Outdoor Rattan Patio Set is down to $80 in gray and brown/beige. It’s the perfect size for small porches and patios, so if you have limited space to work with, this set is built for you. Better yet, this one ships for free. One thing we typically find with sets around this price is that they have a shipping cost of at least $10. Here, you won’t have to worry about that, which makes the deal even sweeter.
Lacoo 3-Piece Outdoor Rattan Patio Set, From $80 (was $160) at Walmart

What Shoppers Should Know
- Frame: Steel
- Weave: PE rattan
- Cushions: Removable polyester with sponge padding
- Table: Tempered glass top
- Best For: Balconies, small patios, apartments, porches
This set opts for PE wicker instead of the natural stuff, which will hold up better in the sun and rain without cracking. You get two armrest chairs and a compact coffee table with a tempered glass top, and the whole thing ships in a single box with hardware included, so setup can be done in around 30 minutes with just one person.
Most 3-piece patio sets in this size class run well above $150 (lesser-quality sets can run around $50-$70), so $80 lands at the low end for what’s included here. It’s not going to replace a full sectional or set for anyone with real space to fill, but for a small balcony or patio that just needs two seats and somewhere to set a drink down, it’s priced very fairly.
Related: Walmart Sells an $80 Patio Set Complete With Enough Seating and Table Space for 4 People
What Shoppers Are Saying
One helpful reviewer wrote that the set is “great for small porches” and is “a lot nicer than I thought.” A second shopper said, “It’s a good little set for a small area,” and “good quality for the price.”
Even with its small footprint, the set is still sturdy: “Very sturdy for a low-profile patio set.” Another reviewer wrote, “Very spacious and the quality of the material is unbelievable. For a cheap set, I didn’t expect what I got.”
If you have a small patio space that could use some TLC, Lacoo’s 3-Piece Outdoor Rattan Patio Set is the one to grab for $80. Since this deal could end at any moment, now’s the time to grab a set if you’re interested, and shipping is free.
Also Check Out
Go to Source
Author: Cameron Cardwell
Will There Ever Be Another Lionel Messi? The Short Answer Is: Yes
Go to Source
Author:
Texans GM Nick Caserio Rules Out In-Season Contract Talks For QB C.J. Stroud
Go to Source
Author:
OpenAI Is About to Release Its First AI Model With ‘Critical’ Cyber Abilities
Go to Source
Author: Maxwell Zeff, Lily Hay Newman
The Diamond Moon and Other Astronomical Events to See in September 2026
Go to Source
Author: Jorge Garay
Can You Actually Trust Your Smart Ring? The Oura Lawsuit Exposes Wearable Tech’s Biggest Flaw
It seems like everybody owns wearable tech these days, and Oura Rings happen to be among the most popular options. But now, the smart ring brand is under scrutiny as it faces a proposed class action lawsuit alleging its devices can’t measure user sleep or cycles as accurately as advertised. The 53-page lawsuit claims that Oura’s AI models perform “guesswork as to what may be happening based on improper results,” rather than tracking users’ sleep stages with up to 95 percent accuracy, as the company has advertised.
The proposed lawsuit takes particular issue with how certain Oura Ring models determine sleep stage data. According to the complaint, the rings “infer” sleep stages using metrics like heart rate, physical movement, peripheral skin temperature, and blood oxygen trend, none of which directly measure activity in the brain.
“The allegations against Oura still have to be proven, and Oura strongly disputes them,” says Michael McCready, Managing Partner at McCready Law. “But from a consumer protection standpoint, the question will be whether the company accurately described what the ring can do and had sufficient scientific support for the level of accuracy it advertised. A product doesn’t have to be perfect, but if you sell precision, you should be able to substantiate precision. Companies selling health-related technology have a responsibility to be just as clear about what their products cannot do as they are enthusiastic about what they can.”
Still, lawyers and health experts alike say a situation like this may serve as a good reminder for consumers to be more mindful of what wearable devices are designed to do. Because while wearable tech can certainly help raise health awareness, encourage healthier habits, and identify personal trends that may be worth discussing, it doesn’t mean they should replace medical-grade equipment or professional medical advice when needed.
“More broadly, I’m a believer in wearables and technology. Data can help people recognize patterns, change habits, and ask better questions. But there’s a danger when we start treating an estimate generated by an algorithm as an unquestionable medical fact. The takeaway for consumers is to use these devices for trends rather than absolutes,” McCready adds.
For instance, if your ring has been telling you that you’ve slept poorly for three weeks, that may be useful information that prompts you to look at your sleep habits or take it to your doctor. But if the device tells you that you spent exactly a certain amount of time in a particular stage of sleep, remember that there’s still measurement, inference, and an entire algorithm standing between your body and that number.
“The real risk with consumer wearables isn’t that they’re inaccurate in every case,” says Arik Ben Ishay, CEO and Co-Founder of Biobeat. “It’s that consumers can’t easily tell when a number is directional and when it’s reliable enough to make a health decision on. A sleep score is a suggestion. A blood pressure reading a physician uses to adjust medication is a decision. Those require very different standards.”
Ultimately, the lesson here is to view wearable data as one piece of information rather than an exact medical finding. If your data consistently points to a potential health problem, use that information as a reason to talk with your doctor rather than trying to diagnose or treat the issue yourself.
Related: Doctors Say You’re Tracking the Wrong Smartwatch Data—Here’s What Actually Matters
Experts
- Michael McCready, Managing Partner at McCready Law
- Arik Ben Ishay, CEO and Co-Founder of Biobeat
Sources
- Oura Lawsuit Claims Rings Cannot Measure Sleep as Advertised. ClassAction, 2026
Go to Source
Author: Kelsey Kryger
Packers Hopeful Josh Jacobs Returns This Season Despite Pending Misdemeanor Charges
Go to Source
Author:
Favorite ‘Dogs: Back ‘New-look’ Louisville To Make Statement Against Ole Miss
Go to Source
Author:
Rams Are Super Bowl Favorites, But Historical Betting Trend Says Beware
Go to Source
Author:

