‘Spider-Man: Brand New Day’ Breaks Rotten Tomatoes Record

Following its record-breaking preview day at the box office, beating out Marvel juggernauts like Avengers: Endgame, Spider-Man: Brand New Day can add another accolade to its list.

The fourth Spider-Man outing in the Marvel Cinematic Universe (MCU), starring Tom Holland as the titular arachnid superhero, holds a 98% audience score on movie review site Rotten Tomatoes as of July 31. This score, should it continue into Brand New Day’s further days and weeks in theaters, places it as the highest-scoring MCU Spider-Man movie among audiences so far.

This is especially good news for Holland, who admitted that, along with his co-star (and now wife) Zendaya and Jacob Batalon, who plays Ned Leeds in the four MCU Spidey films, they “hated” an early cut of the film, designed to please audiences.

In the interview, Holland, on behalf of the trio, said the edit was based on recent test screenings with audiences, but the cast, led by Holland, pushed for a cut more in line with their creative vision for the film. Ultimately, it seems, that Holland and the cast knew best.

Critically, however, there’s another record broken — and it’s a slightly different story. Among the four MCU Spider-Man movies, Brand New Day has the lowest score among critics. Although critical reviews are still coming in, as of July 31, Brand New Day has a critical score of 90%.

Holland’s first three Spidey outings, Spider-Man: Homecoming (2017), Spider-Man: Far From Home (2019), and Spider-Man: No Way Home (2021), have scores of 92%, 91%, and 93%, respectively.

It is doubtful, however, that director Daniel Destin Cretton, along with the all-star cast, will be too disappointed by this still-stellar critical score. To put things in perspective, the original Spider-Man film, released in 2002 and starring Tobey Maguire, stands at 90%, with Spider-Man 3 (2007) sitting at the much lower score of 62%. Andrew Garfield’s films, The Amazing Spider-Man (2012) and The Amazing Spider-Man 2, have respective critic scores of 71% and 50%.

Go to Source
Author: Bethany Gemmell

The Richard Karn-Approved Expandable Garden Hose Is 50% Off on Amazon

Men’s Journal aims to feature only the best products and services.  If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

In This Story

Why We Love This Deal

What’s Richard Karn, better known as the flannel-clad Al Borland from Home Improvement, been up to since he left the set of Tool Time? In a way, it’s like he never left at all. The actor has taken on a host of roles on shows like Assembly Required and Shifting Gears, but he’s also served as a spokesperson for various DIY and tool products. The most notable might be the Pocket Hose, a practical yard tool that’s gone viral on its own merits.

Now, you can actually get the Pocket Hose Ballistic Expandable 50-Foot Garden Hose for 50% off on Amazon. Over 10,000 of these hoses have recently been sold, and the reasoning goes way beyond Karn’s celebrity endorsement. They’re just plain practical for modern living arrangements.

Pocket Hose Ballistic Expandable 50-Foot Garden Hose, $45 (was $90) on Amazon

The Pocket Hose Ballistic Expandable 50-Foot Garden Hose.

Courtesy of Amazon

What Shoppers Should Know

  • Sizes Available: The best value for most shoppers will come from the 50-foot version, but there are 25, 75, and 100-foot versions, too.
  • Material: UV-protected latex and copper
  • Shrinks To When Off: ⅓ of its in-use size

This hose looks like a tiny, coiled-up rattlesnake that triples in size and becomes a full-sized garden hose once the water is turned on. When done, it reverts to its original size. Protected by a UV-blocking coat and fashioned from a polymer used in bulletproof applications, this hose is going to last a long time, being convenient as well.

Besides the Richard Karn tie-in, perfect seasonality, and the cool tech, what’s making this hose do so well right now? I think it goes deeper, with people overall trying to buy items more deliberately, and ones that can move easily, never becoming a permanent fixture. Who wants a hose lying around the front and back yard, when you can get one hose that you can pull out whenever you need it and easily get started at either location?

It’s also an essential hose for apartment dwellers who would like to be able to use one for car cleaning and the like, then store it in a small bag and bring it home, without treating neighbors to their personal belongings.

Related: Pegboards Are One of the Best Garage Storage Hacks, and Walmart Has Them on Sale for $28

See It in Action

“I’m Rich Karn, and everyone loves my hose, but your hose? I don’t think so,” taunts Karn at the beginning of the commercial, showing off the hose’s expandable nature, advanced spigot, and bragging about its 100+ patents.

The Pocket Hose Ballistic Expandable 50-Foot Garden Hose is just $45 while this deal lasts.

Shop More Deals

Go to Source
Author: John Alexander

I Tested a Carbon Fiber Folding E-Bike That Changes the Game

Men’s Journal aims to feature only the best products and services.  If you buy something via one of our links, we may earn a commission.

The biggest problem with folding e-bikes has never been the folding—it’s the weight. Most models weigh well over 60 pounds, making them difficult to carry up apartment stairs, lift into a car trunk, or bring onto public transit. The Urtopia Carbon Fold ST changes that by using a full carbon fiber frame to keep the total weight to just 31 pounds. After testing it in real-world commuting scenarios, it’s one of the few folding electric bikes I’ve used that actually delivers on the promise of portability without sacrificing ride quality—while still providing decent daily range.

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike Review

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike

Courtesy Image

Urtopia built its reputation on making carbon fiber e-bikes more attainable, and the Carbon Fold ST is their most compelling proof of concept yet. The carbon fiber frame and fork help with vibration dampening but the ride still feels stiff enough for responsive handling. Combine that with the low step-through geometry and you get a bike that’s genuinely easy to mount and dismount in stop-and-go city traffic, regardless of flexibility or fitness level.

Fit specs say it can accommodate riders from 4’11” to 6’5″, though it’s worth flagging: riders north of 6’2″ should test ride one first, since the telescoping stem maxes out at around 5’11” before the cockpit can start to feel cramped. I’m 6’3″ but have a longer torso and it fit me fine; I even ended up lowering the stem down a bit to get a little more comfy.

The Fold Actually Works

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike

Adam Bible

Most folding bikes suffer from a specific problem: once folded, they swing back open the moment you try to lift them if there’s no latching mechanism. Urtopia solved this with magnetic retention plates on the fork leg and rear frame that hold the bike in place when folded. Because the Carbon Fold ST is so light at 31 pounds, the magnets do work—it holds when you’re lifting and moving the folded bike—though I’d like to see them use a bit stronger of a magnet, it can pop off if jostled or set down awkwardly.

Folded dimensions come in at 28 high, 32 long, and 19 inches wide—compact enough for a car trunk, an elevator, or under a desk. The whole process takes about 30 seconds once you’ve done it a few times.

Motor, Ride Feel, and the Smart Mode Worth Using

The 250 watt rear hub motor peaks at 500 watts and delivers 42Nm of torque through a torque sensor rather than a cadence sensor, which means power delivery scales with how hard you’re pedaling rather than just detecting rotation. Acceleration is smooth and consistent—not punchy or aggressive, just smooth and capable. Four assist modes cover the range from Eco to Boost, but the standout is Smart mode, which dynamically reads both torque and cadence to determine the right assist level automatically. I ended up keeping it in Smart mode most of the time, the takeoff torque seemed punchier and smoother than in my other most frequent choice, Boost.

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike

Adam Bible

I would also suggest upgrading to the thumb throttle, it made takeoffs and cruising more enjoyable and relaxing. Without it you’ll have to pedal (obviously) to get the motor to assist you, which can be slightly annoying depending on the situation. Having the option for both is well worth the extra $29.

Urtopia’s bikes have a consistent signature across the lineup—quiet motors and a refined, smooth ride—and the Carbon Fold ST delivers both. There’s no motor whine, no jerky power delivery, just a pleasant riding experience.

Braking comes from Tektro 2-piston hydraulic disc brakes with 160mm rotors front and rear—nice hardware for a bike this light, and they gave me plenty stopping confidence in wet or dry conditions. The 7-speed Shimano drivetrain with a 14-28T cassette handles varied terrain without complaint, and a chain guard keeps grease off your pant leg. Though be warned that the easiest way to carry the bike will put the rest of the chain close to contacting your leg—if you have nice work pants on you may end up with a black streak or two if you’re not careful when toting it around.

Range: Honest Numbers

Urtopia claims up to 50 miles. Real-world testing tells a more conservative story. In Boost mode, expect around 17 miles; in Eco mode, I got around 35 miles on relatively flat terrain. Like most range estimates, that 50-mile figure requires near-perfect conditions—zero elevation gain, no wind, and a rider well under the 220-pound weight limit. For most urban commuters covering 10 to 15 miles round-trip, charging while at work or nightly means range is never a concern. Just don’t rely on the specs for a long-haul jaunts.

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike

Adam Bible

The 252Wh battery integrates into the removable seatpost, so you can either plug in at the top of the post or pull it out and bring it inside. A 3.5-hour fast charger ships in the box—practical for daily commuters who don’t want to wait around all day for a full charge.

The Trade-offs

The 220-pound weight limit excludes heavier riders (though I’m 230 and it performed well for me), and the small 252Wh battery is the unavoidable cost of keeping the whole package under 31 pounds, though you can buy another battery for $449 and carry it with you if you need to double your range. There’s no suspension, so rough urban pavement can be felt in your hands—the carbon frame softens it somewhat, but don’t expect a super plush ride. And the Carbon Fold ST doesn’t connect to the Urtopia app, so all settings live in the on-board display menu, which is easy to navigate but means no remote diagnostics or firmware updates.

I did test riding the bike with battery assist turned off, and found it light enough that pedalling on flats and small hills felt pretty much the same as riding a non-powered bike. The only drawback was the amount of effort I had to put in, as a large person, made the stem flex more than I was comfortable with (hence why I moved it down a bit) and the plastic fold up pedals made some concerning groaning noises. One upgrade that I may do is swapping the pedals out for some metal folding models.

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Pros & Cons

Pros

  • Exceptionally light at just 31 pounds
  • Premium carbon fiber frame and fork
  • Smooth, natural-feeling torque sensor
  • Fold stays securely closed with magnetic retention
  • Excellent hydraulic brakes
  • Quiet motor and refined ride quality
  • Compact enough for apartments, offices, and public transit
  • Outstanding value for a carbon fiber e-bike

Cons

  • Real-world range is well below the advertised maximum
  • 220-pound rider weight limit
  • No suspension for rough pavement
  • No smartphone app connectivity
  • Cockpit can feel cramped for taller riders

Is the Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Worth Buying?

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Folding E-Bike

Adam Bible

The Urtopia Carbon Fold ST solves the one problem that has made folding e-bikes more theoretical than practical for most city riders: it’s actually light enough to use the way folding bikes are supposed to be used. The ride quality is genuinely good, the fold mechanism stays folded (mostly), the hydraulic brakes and torque sensor are top quality for the price point, and the carbon fiber frame delivers a premium feel that no aluminum competitor at this price can replicate. If you’ve written off folding e-bikes because you couldn’t stomach the idea of wrestling 65 pounds up a flight of stairs every day, the Carbon Fold ST is worth a serious look.

Urtopia Carbon Fold ST Specs

  • Motor: 250W rear hub, 500W peak, 42Nm torque
  • Battery: 36V, 7Ah (252Wh)
  • Top Speed: 28 mph
  • Folded Dimensions: 28 x 32 x 19 in.
  • Weight: 31 lbs.
  • Range: Up to 50 miles; 16.5–35 miles real-world
  • Price: $1,599

Go to Source
Author: Adam Bible

2026 MLB Odds: Dodgers Become Major Liability Amid Skubal Trade Talks

With the MLB trade deadline set for 6 p.m. ET on Monday, and as the calendar simultaneously flips to August, World Series odds are attracting more attention. That includes one Caesars Sports customer who thinks the Dodgers just might land Tigers ace Tarik Skubal between now and Monday night. “We just took a $10,000 bet [Friday] morning on the Dodgers +175 to win the World Series,” Caesars head of baseball trading Eric Biggio said Friday afternoon. Biggio and Caesars senior baseball trader Matt Torchia help break down 2026 World Series odds and action, as the regular season hits its final two months. This page may contain affiliate links to legal sports betting partners. If you sign up or place a wager, FOX Sports may be compensated. Read more about Sports Betting on FOX Sports. Skubal Sweepstakes At 51-58, Detroit is fourth in the AL Central and trails seven teams in the AL wild-card chase. That means the Tigers will likely be trade-deadline sellers, with Skubal the best piece to offer up by far. The left-handed ace can walk as a free agent after this season, so Detroit almost assuredly wants something in return. As of Friday afternoon, the Dodgers are the frontrunner to snag him. If that happens, then World Series favorite Los Angeles would surely move off its current +175 price, becoming an even stronger favorite, likely in the +140 range. But Caesars wouldn’t be that enthused about a third straight Dodgers championship. “We’re OK to the Dodgers on straight bets,” Biggio said. “But what’s been popular with bettors is including the Dodgers in futures parlays. That connected for a few of our players last year. “I think there’s gonna be some futures parlay liability with the Dodgers.” Banking On Boston A huge surprise over the past month has been the resurgence of the Red Sox. On July 1, Boston was 37-48 and an afterthought for the playoffs. Then came a 15-game win streak, which comprised the bulk of a 20-2 run that actually began in late June. That took the Sox from 100/1 long shot to +1800 10th choice in Caesars World Series odds. If the season ended today, Boston would be the second of three AL wild-card teams. “A good amount of bets came in on the Red Sox at some decent numbers for the bettors,” Biggio said. “Not many got in at the peak of 100/1, but there are some tickets at 50/1 and 40/1. “We’re still OK to the Red Sox, though. They’re a good story, and their playoff matchups would draw a lot of action. Red Sox-Yankees and Red Sox-White Sox would do a lot of business.” And a Red Sox-Dodgers World Series — a repeat of the 2018 championship, won by Boston — would do massive numbers at sportsbooks. Southside Ride Arguably the biggest surprise of the 2026 MLB season is the White Sox sitting atop the AL Central, at 57-51. In fact, through games of July 30, only the Rays (64-44) and Yankees (61-48) have better records in the AL, and Chicago is tied with Boston. So a team that opened at a massive +30000 (300/1) at Caesars is now all the way to +2500. And plenty of bettors got on the White Sox at longer-shot odds. “Our position on the White Sox is a pretty big red figure, and I imagine it’s similar at other sportsbooks,” Biggio said. “All those $10 and $20 bets add up.” Indeed, a $20 flier at 300/1 would profit $6,000 if the White Sox lift the trophy. If you got frisky and put down a hundred bucks — which surely some people did — that bet would profit $30,000. Torchia pointed to a couple other surprising teams that would blow up Caesars’ bottom line in World Series odds, including the Pirates and the Cardinals. Both are within three games in the NL wild-card hunt. Pittsburgh is a dead-even 55-55, 2.5 games out of the third and final wild-card slot. St. Louis is 54-55, three games out in the wild card. Pittsburgh opened at +15000 (150/1) to win the World Series and is now +7500. “The Pirates have been a fun story. Every year, they seem to do this, and they normally flame out,” Torchia said. “But this year, they’re stuck around .500 and maybe could eke out a Wild Card spot. “We’d take a big hit on the Pirates winning the World Series.” As for St. Louis: “It’s not as much of a hit on the Cardinals, but it wouldn’t be great for us,” Torchia said. “We had their win total at 74.5. We had no faith in them. They’ve outperformed their expectations. “And our customers were betting into the Cardinals, because of the name brand and the big price.” All that said, as noted above, the Pirates are still well down the oddsboard at +7500, and the Cardinals are double that at +15000 (150/1). Texas Twosome The top three teams in tickets and money in Caesars’ World Series odds are the Dodgers — by far — followed by the Yankees and Mariners. New York is the +550 second choice to win it all, trailing only Los Angeles. Seattle is the +1600 co-seventh choice, despite currently sitting sub-.500 at 53-57. Torchia said Caesars is rooting for two of the Mariners’ division rivals at this point. “We’d like to see the Astros or the Rangers win the World Series,” he said. Like Seattle, both Texas and Houston are hovering around .500, with the Rangers in first at 55-54 and Houston a half-game back at 55-55. “I could see Texas as a sleeper, a good under-the-radar team. Nobody talks about the Rangers,” Torchia said. The Rangers are +1600 — joining the M’s — while the Astros are +3500 in World Series futures. Biggio agreed that Texas and Houston are both good for the book. But he’s really looking for the least attractive matchup possible. “I’m rooting for a non-sexy World Series, the most boring possible: the Brewers vs. the Rays,” Biggio said. “They both play the best fundamental baseball. I think the Brewers are very underrated.” Biggio might just get that matchup. Tampa Bay (64-44) has the AL’s best record and is the +1200 co-fourth choice in odds to win the World Series, joined by the Braves. Milwaukee (67-41) has the second-best mark in all baseball, behind only the Dodgers (69-40). Caesars has the Brew Crew at +900, the third choice to win it all, trailing only the Dodgers and Yankees.

Go to Source
Author:

So Sleek & So Clean: 8 Elements To Like About INDYCAR’s Newly Designed Ride

INDYCAR HEADQUARTERS (Indianapolis) — I got to see the 2028 INDYCAR. And there is a lot to like. Well, it won’t be exactly what will run at the track starting in 2028. With 19 months to go before it actually is used to race, it will undergo more tweaks and adjustments. Testing starts Saturday and Sunday, with Alexander Rossi in the car on Saturday and Alex Palou in it on Sunday. It won’t have the actual race engines, as Chevrolet and Honda are still developing their power plants. Instead, it will have a 2.4-liter V-6 engine that was developed a few years ago but never used. It won’t have the hybrid system operational. But the tests over the next few months will inform INDYCAR about what might need to be changed before parts and pieces are started in mass production. INDYCAR doesn’t expect full tests of the entire field until after the 2027 season. “This weekend … is just some very basic metrics that we need to get off the car,” INDYCAR VP of Competition and Race Engineering Mike O’Gara told me and other reporters Friday afternoon when showing us the car. “Lap time is not even on our radar just yet. For a brand-new car, you really need to make sure it starts, it steers, and it stops. And then you start looking at more and more data and measuring more things. “If we get through these next couple days with a car that we know the braking system and the steering system work fine and the new damper system is doing what it’s supposed to, it’ll be a good test.” But leave no doubt, this car is well into its development. And for 2028, here are eight things that seem cool. Elements of the car that folks really might like. Things that are noticeable when taking a close look at the car. It’s designed to be faster — without compromising safety. And also, it’s about 100 pounds lighter than the current car used today. We’ll get into more of the tech elements after the test, but this is more what strikes me at first look. 1. LED Lights This was tried a handful of years ago. But trying to incorporate the system into an existing car produced too many problems with overheating and vibrations. It also caused issues with the car’s ability to work properly overall. But now the LED lights, which will show a car’s place during a race and potentially the time of the pit stop, should be good to go. Used in other series including IMSA, it will help fans know what place the car is in while it races. “Anti-vibration is built into it, everything in terms of the way that that carbon was built, so that it fits perfectly in there,” INDYCAR Senior VP of Competition and Operations Mark Silba told me and the gathered media. “There’s also been technical advances that have happened, and we worked with Dallara on that to build a panel that would be more robust. … That’s something we absolutely wanted to bring back for the fans.” 2. Front Wing The front wing still looks good. And for Indianapolis Motor Speedway, the design of the big curved sidepods should help with air flow to allow drivers who are third, fourth, fifth in line to be able to have an easier time making passes. I’m not sure if it is just the way the nose now looks toward the ground, but the front wing is distinctly INDYCAR. 3. It’s Sleek The car appears a little more narrow. It still has that soda-bottle look. It looks cleaner than the current car, and frankly it should. The current car, which debuted in 2012, has had things bolted on and added for safety or aerodynamic reasons. “There’s been a conscious effort to look at the nose-up attitude of the car in different yaw situations and to reduce lift,” O’Gara said. “The current car we’ve sort of piled all these things on. We have flaps on the tire ramps at the speedway, and we have flaps on the back of the under tray at the speedway. “We ran a spine on the current car. This car has none of that. Because all of the learnings from what those have all helped the cars from blowing over. From trying to make them more stable when you’re sideways or sliding backwards — we’ve seen those aero effects, and they’ve been integrated into the actual shape of the body of the car.” 4. Aeroscreen & Halo More Crisp The aeroscreen and halo, now incorporated into the car, definitely look better. It’s not as bulky. They describe it as having more of a fighter pilot look, and it is hard to argue with that. “When you see the car head-on, the windscreen and cockpit, it just fits better,” O’Gara said. 5. Clear Rear Panel There is a clear panel at the rear of the car that will allow people to see the engine cover. It will allow for engine manufacturer branding to be seen through the panel. There’s also a small area where fans — when just looking at the car as it sits on the grid — can see a little bit of the suspension underneath the body. 6. Steering Wheel And Fewer Knobs More of the controls will move to the steering wheel, giving the cockpit area a slightly cleaner look, while still boasting a steering wheel that looks cool. Plus, there’s a safety element. “We’ve tried to limit the number of controls in the car, so you’ll see a lot less knobs and buttons and levers and things like that,” O’Gara said. “The anti-roll bars are electronic now in the car, so they’re on electric actuators, and it’ll be up to the team to configure. But probably the thumb wheels that are on the steering wheel will adjust the anti-roll bars. “It’s going to allow the drivers to not pull their hand off the wheel when they’re making these adjustments for one, but it’s also less stuff in the cockpit for them to hit their hands.” 7. Bigger Cockpit The cockpit is bigger, allowing drivers of all sizes to be more comfortable in the car. It will also potentially be cooler. And we’re not talking about the looks in this instance but about the temperatures inside. “It’s safer because there’s more padding now around the driver,” O’Gara said. “It allows for a wider range of drivers.” Also, the seat doesn’t adjust but the controls can be moved to come toward the driver. 8. Cool Factor Which brings us to the last part of this piece. The cool factor when it comes to temperatures doesn’t mean it won’t be hot. The drivers, though, hopefully won’t feel that they are in an oven just baking throughout a race. The infrastructure needs of the current cool suit system are part of the car and there are many other ways the car is designed to be more comfortable. “The helmet cooling will be through the radiator ducts,” O’Gara said. “There’s cooling up top on the shock cover where we currently have cooling, and then underneath the car, there’s an area where … the bottom of the tub is sort of boat shaped, and at the very tip of that is a screen that comes right in under the steering column, blows air right on the driver. “So a lot more cooling for the driver.” Whew. That’s a good thing. It’s time to get started. “Teams will start receiving cars in about June of next year,” O’Gara said. “We’re going to coordinate the testing with all the teams. So, initially, it’ll be one car per team starting once the 2027 INDYCAR season finishes.”

Go to Source
Author:

Tints, Balms, and Lipsticks: 7 Must-Have Products for the Perfect Blurred Lip

In case you missed it, the blurred lip trend is back, and everyone is doing what they can to get the look. Yes, there is a technique to it (more on that below), but there are also some makeup products you can invest in that do half of the work for you. As it turns out, what might look incredibly difficult to replicate can actually be easy with the right formulas.

“The blurred lip is a softer, more effortless take on traditional lipstick,” says makeup artist and leading educator at Sephora Shanzey Al-Amin. “Instead of a perfectly defined lip line, the color is diffused around the edges to create a subtle, cloud-like effect.” She adds that this trend was heavily inspired by Korean beauty and became popular because of its fresh and modern look that gives lips a fuller appearance without looking overdone.

Still, with the market full of products promising the perfect blurred effect, I decided to dig deeper and chat more with Al-Amin, along with celebrity makeup artist Scott Barnes, to find out which ones are actually worth your hard-earned money. Check out their top products below!

The Best Blurry Lip Products, at a Glance

The Best Blurry Lip Products in 2026

Best Overall: MAC Cosmetics Powder Kiss Hazy Matte Lipstick

Best Liner: Make Up For Ever Artist Color Pencil Long-Lasting Lip Liner

Best Splurge: Violette_FR Bisou Balm Sheer Matte Lipstick

Best Balm: Nyx Professional Makeup Smushy Matte Lip Balm

Best Hybrid: Sephora Collection Cream Lip Stain 10hr Liquid Lipstick

Best Lip Stain: Fenty Beauty Poutsicle Hydrating Lip Stain

Best Budget: Sheglam Marshmallow Puff Lip Blur Pen

What’s the best way to achieve a blurry lip?

Once you have the product of your choice, there are a few simple steps needed to get a blurry lip. Here’s the full breakdown.

  1. Exfoliate and prep: Smooth lips are the best place to start for any lip look. Barnes recommends gently exfoliating with something like NCLA’s Sugar, Sugar 100% Natural Lip Scrub followed by a tried-and-true formula like Aquaphor’s Lip Repair.
  2. Apply your product: Al-Amin suggests starting by applying lip color to the center of your lips rather than the entire area.
  3. Tap the color in: From there, use your fingertip or a small lip brush to blend the product outward to keep the edges soft.
  4. Build it up: After getting the technique down, feel free to build up the color to your preference.
  5. Add-on (optional): While this is not required, Al-Amin notes that you can layer on a gloss or balm if you don’t want a fully matte finish.

How We Chose

As with all of our buying guides at Who What Wear, we compile our edits based on original testing and expert recommendations. To find the best blurry lip products, we leaned heavily on makeup artist insights and our knowledge as beauty experts. We also considered several factors, including shade range, product type, and customer reviews. We’re aware of how important these factors are for a wide range of needs and preferences, so we made sure to list out all the helpful details.

Why Trust Who What Wear

At Who What Wear, we know that beauty isn’t one-size-fits-all. Since 2006, our editors have tested thousands of products—including skincare, makeup, haircare, and nails—while also working closely with trusted experts, like renowned dermatologists, celebrity makeup artists, and other leading industry insiders. Together, this ensures every guide is well-researched, inclusive, and relevant to you.

Who What Wear has been a digital fashion, beauty, and lifestyle publication and community where people can discover the latest brands, trends, and must-have products to help define and evolve their personal style. Think of Who What Wear as your most trusted style and shopping resource.

Go to Source
Author:

Q&A With Chad Ochocino Johnson: Who Complains About Madden Ratings? Surprise Teams For ’26?

As NFL teams open training camps this week, there are significant football numbers being unveiled. Yes, EA Sports celebrated “Madden NFL 27 Ratings Week,” with a few elite players earning the rare 99 rating and everyone else complaining. The target of their disappointment is former Bengals receiver Chad Ochocinco Johnson, who made six Pro Bowls in a colorful 11-year NFL career and has found a second chapter as a “ratings adjuster” for EA Sports, traveling to games and scouting players in person for his role in choosing their rating. Johnson took a few minutes to talk with FOX Sports about the seriousness and silliness of football video game ratings and his readiness to back up his numbers when players take issue. Chomping on a cigar and wearing an MLS soccer jacket, he talked about everything from a penchant for generous tipping to his favorite receivers to the World Cup and his love of McDonald’s. What is your phone like on a day like today when players find out their ratings for the year? Johnson: In the past, when they didn’t have someone that was in charge of the ratings, they could be upset. They could complain. You can’t complain to me, because I can pull up and show you exactly what you are. I can show you why you’re an 82. You see, this game, where you disappear because you’re playing against one of the better players in the NFL. That’s why you’re rated where you are. Can you do it week in and week out against the best? You disappear; that’s why you’re not rated high. There’s a reason Myles Garrett is a f—ing 99. I’m a former player that played at a very high level and was elite at what he did. This is why you’re rated where you are: you disappear in f—ing games. I don’t want you to name specific names, but is there a position that might complain the most about ratings? Johnson: Every position complains. I’m not going to call out names, but especially skill-position DBs and receivers. Oh man, yeah. The funny thing about this is a great thing: You have 17 weeks to show me otherwise. You have 17 weeks to show me and don’t disappear. Listen, I understand you’re going to drop the ball as a defensive back. You’re going to get beat. It happens. I don’t care who you are; it shouldn’t happen often. But you can appreciate how much these numbers actually mean to players. Johnson: It meant something to me, because I’m a huge gamer. That’s a reflection of who I am. Your ratings numbers are a reflection of what you do on the field. That’s why it means so much. Your title is ratings adjuster. How much adjusting can you do based on your own opinion? Up or down a point? Two? Johnson: Yeah, I would say so. I think my input when it comes to adjusting, outside of those who are above my pay grade, my input matters, because I actually played the game. Not saying they’re not worthy of being able to analyze and make decisions based on what they can also see. Our eyes are one and the same. Even if you haven’t played the game, you can see: You know what? This guy, he’s not really what he thinks he is, and this is why. Having me in there to give that input, it pays dividends. Everything is fair, based on where everyone is rated right now. If you don’t like where you’re rated, show me on Sunday. You get to take very seriously something that’s still just a video game. Do you enjoy how seriously some people take it? Johnson: Absolutely, because it’s more than just a video game. Your production is based on how you get paid, so we base your production on your rating as well. It might just be a video game to some, but to some, it’s a serious matter. I know the 99s are elite, and you’re careful in how you give them out. Who is someone who doesn’t have a 99 this year, but is closest? Johnson: Easy, the quarterbacks, Patrick Mahomes (93 rating this year). [Matthew] Stafford and [Josh] Allen are the only two [99s] this year. Mahomes, Lamar Jackson (94 overall), of course. Can you get it done in the playoffs where it matters most? Some receivers should very well be back in the conversation. Justin Jefferson (94 overall), now you have a quarterback. The inconsistency at play at the quarterback position is why you’re not rated where you once were. Puka Nacua (98) has a chance this year to be a 99 at some point because he is really good. His body of work is phenomenal. You’re on the road for 18 weeks straight during the season. Your schedule isn’t set yet, but what’s that like for you? Johnson: I’m ready for it. I’m excited. I love it, because it allows me to still be around the game. It still allows me to be integrated into the game in some sort. Anyone who follows you on social media knows how generous you are, leaving $1,000 tips at nearly any restaurant. When did that start, and why is it still so important for you to help people out like that? Johnson: That started for me back in 2001, when I first came into some money. I remember at times not being able to tip as much as I’d like in high school, going to IHOP, going to Denny’s, hearing their stories on how the service industry or minimum wage wasn’t enough. It wasn’t a livable wage in general, and everybody, they say, ‘Well, get a better job,’ not understanding how difficult it is for certain people based on their circumstances to for one, have transportation for a better job. Everybody’s in unfortunate situations they can’t control. What I can control is the man upstairs being able to bless me in abundance, and me being able to make sure I’m going to make this individual’s day. I started the $1,000 tipping in 2001, and I’ve been doing it now for the past 25 years. Shannon [Sharpe] and I had a funny argument on “Nightcap” about this. He tips based on service, and a lot of people jumped on me about, “Well, if the service is bad, I’m not tipping.” The first thing I say is we’ve lived in this world a very long time, and we’ve all dealt with some goddamn idiots. So there’s no telling what this server had to deal with before you. I’m always tipping $1,000 because you never know what the person had to go through, had to deal with before you got there. Do you think servers know who you are now? Are they fighting to get your table at places? Johnson: I like when they’re not aware, but sure, especially when I’m in Miami and when I’m in Cincinnati, I go to restaurants, and they already know what’s coming. I just left Charlotte after two days. They had no idea, but they knew once I left. It’s something I will always continue to do as long as the man upstairs continues to bless me. I will always do that. I know you’re a huge soccer fan, and you make a point to get to the biggest games. If I give you a chance to brag, who are the elite soccer players you’ve been able to meet in person? Johnson: That’s easy. Multiple times, obviously the two best in the world, the GOATs, depending on who you ask, would be Cristiano Ronaldo and Messi. I’ve met them since Messi was a baby. Not a literal baby, but at Barcelona, I was there when he debuted. Ronaldinho and I have met. We’re friends now. Cristiano and I are friends since he was at Sporting Lisbon. [Mario] Balotelli, [Paul] Pogba, [Gerard] Piqué, Marcelo. Oh, my goodness! The list goes on and on. Son Heung-Min, meeting one of my favorite South Korean players who played for Tottenham. Sol Campbell, Thierry Henry, [Zlatan] Ibrahimovic. Oh, my goodness. Samuel Eto’o. Let me think. Neymar, obviously. Brazilian Ronaldo, who I’ve met twice; he doesn’t speak good English, but “That’s Ocho, I know his face.” Kaka and I became friends when he was here at Orlando City. Antoine Griezmann, who played at Atletico and for the French national team, he’s now at Orlando City and I know him extremely well. Just to name a few. Every offseason, as soon as the season ends, I just leave and go to Europe and I hop from city to city. Because of me being with Reebok or when I was with Nike, they bridge the gap to meet the players easily. How proud were you of how the United States handled hosting a World Cup? Johnson: It was beautiful. It was beautiful. The fact that we did such a phenomenal job, Gianni [Infantino] having the World Cup here in the U.S. and all the parties and power that be were involved, converted a lot of people into loving the game of soccer. It’s so difficult for us to appreciate here because we have so many other sports to choose from, but getting a better cultural aspect on how good and how awesome those games could be, especially for those able to attend matches in person. Listen, we love our sports here. We think we’re crazy about them. They went crazy in New York about the Knicks winning a championship. Go to a regular game in Europe. We got a small sample size, an appetizer of what it’s like for them culturally when it comes to the beautiful game. I think it was a great thing and we converted a lot of fans. I think the MLS will take over from here, continuing to grow the game here in the States. Unrelated: How many days out of 365 in a year are you eating at McDonald’s? Johnson: Honestly, maybe 362. I just call that a fasting day. Always the same McDonald’s? Johnson: Any time I’m in Miami, it’s the same McDonald’s. When I’m in Cincinnati, it’s the same McDonald’s over in Covington. When I travel, it’s a little bit different. Wherever the closest one is to the hotel, that’s where I frequent. I do eat other things. What do you think of this year’s Bengals? The offense will be great, but what about the defense? Johnson: That’s the problem. With the concerns, I’m hoping those voids are filled. Having Brian Cook come in, Dexter Lawrence to help with the run, we have some young linebackers who played somewhat well, had their ups and downs as rookies. I’m looking for them to make that next step. I’m excited for us. I’m not worried about us offensively. I’m worried about us defensively, and our defense has been our Achilles heel for a very long time. If we can have a good year defensively and we score 35 or 30 a game like we already did, if we don’t allow the other team to score 40, I’m happy. I don’t know what’s going to happen. I know we made the improvements necessary to give us the best chance to win. You had one year with the Patriots. What’s your favorite Tom Brady story? Johnson: My favorite Tom Brady story, I can’t even tell. It’s just personal. Athletes confide in you in a way that it would never get out, and that’s something that you would never tell. But Tommy, Tommy is awesome, man. He’s one of those guys you see on TV. To see him as a quarterback, it’s like if God said, “You know what, I’m going to make the perfect person.” Not only a person, the perfect football player that people can look up to. It is him, man. Words can’t describe what Tom means to me, not as a teammate but as a friend. Who are your top five receivers in today’s NFL? Johnson: That’s easy. I’m always putting Uno first. Ja’Marr Chase always goes first. Justin Jefferson would be 2. Three is tricky. I’m going to slash it between Puka Nacua and JSN (Jaxon Smith-Njigba). The four and five get tricky because there are so many people worthy of that slot. We could go CeeDee Lamb. The way George Pickens played last year, we could put George there as well. What about A.J. Brown? What about DeVonta Smith? You know, it’s so tough. I’m just going to name those four, because there are so many others that are worthy, and I’m not trying to piss anybody off. Last year, you were way ahead in picking the Panthers to win their division. Who are your breakout teams for 2026? Johnson: That’s a great question. Can I go out on a limb and say the New York Jets? I’m not sure that limb is as sturdy as it was last year when I said the Bears and Panthers and stood on a table and beat my chest about them. They did exactly what I said they were going to do. I want to say the Jets. I think Aaron Glenn, in his second year, has a tremendous amount of change offensively, having a quarterback in Geno Smith with the arm talent like no other up there with Matt Stafford and Aaron Rodgers, regardless of what people may think about it. Garrett Wilson should have a year, and then for them to steer that ship, changing some of the bad tastes people have had in their mouths over the years.

Go to Source
Author: