Month: March 2023

The veteran RB would return to fantasy relevancy if he signs with one of these five teams.

The running back position doesn’t have a ton of superstars available on the free agent market, but there’s a few names of interest … including Kareem Hunt. A one-time fantasy superstar, he floundered behind Nick Chubb in Cleveland last season, averaging fewer than eight fantasy points per game. It’s the first time he’s averaged fewer than 12.7 points per game in a season during his career.

Hunt, who is entering his age-28 season, needs to leave the Browns as a free agent – and get out of Chubb’s statistical shadow – if he’s to increase his fantasy value. If that happens, here are five teams with a need at running back that would be good spots for Hunt to land next season. Let’s start off with the NFC champions.

Philadelphia Eagles

The Eagles could decide to let Miles Sanders, who is coming off a career season, walk as a free agent. That would leave them with a void in their backfield that could be filled by Hunt. He could be a much cheaper option than Sanders for a team that is slightly over the salary cap at this point in time. The veteran would likely end up in a committee, but Hunt would certainly be on the flex radar in the Eagles offense.

Carolina Panthers

The Panthers could be in the market for a running back, as veteran D’Onta Foreman is slated to become a free agent. Hunt could be signed at a good price and form a backfield committee with Chuba Hubbard in an offensive attack that could use more playmakers. Carolina will want to run the football under new coach Frank Reich, and Hunt would be the lead back and a potential No. 2 fantasy runner or flex option.

Top Five Fantasy Landing Spots: Aaron Rodgers | Jimmy Garoppolo | Saquon Barkley | Tony Pollard | JuJu Smith-Schuster | Miles Sanders | Derek Carr | Lamar Jackson | David Montgomery | Josh Jacobs | Jamaal Williams

Miami Dolphins

The Dolphins could have a gaping hole in the backfield, as Raheem Mostert, Jeff Wilson Jr., Salvon Ahmed (RFA) and Myles Gaskin are all slated to be free agents. If the team decides to go the free agent route, Hunt could be an option. Miami could pair him with Mostert or Wilson if either is retained, but Hunt would project as the team’s new early-down and goal-line option in Mike McDaniel’s offense.

Buffalo Bills

Devin Singletary is slated to become a free agent, and James Cook isn’t built to be a true featured back. So, what if the Bills decided to go with Hunt to be the lead runner in a committee? He would lose red-zone chances to quarterback Josh Allen, but he would also be in a balanced offense in which defenses can’t key on the run. Hunt would remain in the flex starter conversation as a member of the Bills.

Denver Broncos

There have been reports that Javonte Williams (knee) could miss the start of next season, leaving the Broncos with a potential hole in their backfield. Hunt could be signed and become the lead back until Williams returns, after which time he would be in a committee under new coach Sean Payton. It’s not a bad option for either side, and Hunt could hold RB2 value while Williams is on the road to recovery.

Michael Fabiano is an award-winning fantasy football analyst on Sports Illustrated and a member of the Fantasy Sports Writers Association (FSWA) Hall of Fame. Click here to read all his articles here on SI Fantasy. You can follow Michael on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, and Instagram for your late-breaking fantasy news and the best analysis in the business to help you win a fantasy championship!

He discussed the retreat at length, and what it means for his future, on a podcast released Wednesday.

Aaron Rodgers has emerged from the darkness, but he’s not quite ready to shine a light on what his future in football holds.

In his first public comments about his recent darkness retreat, and whether he’s come to a decision about playing football in 2023—and whether that will be with the Packers or another team—Rodgers says that he fully intends to make an announcement “sooner rather than later,” acknowledging that an early decision is best for all involved.

Appearing on the Aubrey Marcus Podcast Wednesday, Rodgers was asked whether he has a timeline for a decision. He cited the Packers’ situation with Brett Favre in 2008, when he retired in March before choosing to return to football months later, eventually requesting his release from Green Bay before being traded to the Jets. Rodgers, Favre’s former backup, doesn’t want things to play out in a similar way, citing “tension” among the team that summer.

“It’s best for anybody who has an interest in this to make a decision sooner rather than later,” Rodgers said. “I remember when Favre… before he retired, there were times in April and May, we weren’t sure if he was going to come back because he didn’t come to any of the offseason program. Then in 2008, he actually did retire in March and then kind of said, ’No, no, no,’ actually in June after OTAs, ‘I actually want to come back and play.’ And that’s when he was traded to the Jets. There was obviously a lot of tension that summer.  For everybody involved directly and indirectly, it’s best for a decision earlier.

“I feel really good about the conversations that are going to be had, that have been had with important people in my life, yourself included, that helped to orient me. But I’m not looking for somebody to tell me what the answer is. All the answers are right inside me. I touched many of them, definitely the feelings on both sides in the darkness. I’m thankful for that time. There’s a finality to the decision. I don’t make it lightly. I don’t want to drag anybody around. I’m answering questions about it because I got asked about it. I’m talking about it because it’s important to me. If you don’t like it and you think it’s drama, and you think I’m being a diva or whatever, then just tune it out. That’s fine. But this is my life. It’s important to me. I’ll make a decision soon enough and we’ll go down that road. I’ll be really excited about it.”

The decision doesn’t come down to whether Rodgers believes he can still play. He referenced being “doubted” after the 2019 NFL season—a down year by his standards as he adjusted to first-year coach Matt LaFleur’s offense. He’d go on to win back-to-back NFL MVP awards the next two years.

“I’ve been doubted before,” Rodgers said. “Honestly, I felt in the first year that Matt was here—Matt was in Green Bay in 2019—I felt at times like a game manager. I didn’t quite understand what we were doing at times on offense. My job is to take care of the football, and I did. I threw four interceptions and 26 touchdowns and we were 13–3, but I felt like there was so much more. And then they drafted my replacement [Jordan Love]. And then I won MVP twice. I threw 85 touchdowns and nine interceptions in two years. And obviously, there were changes that happened on the team and the coaching staff and I didn’t have my best year playing, and there’s probably people who think I’m done. I thought I was done before I became COVID MVP twice. There would be plenty of inspiration down that road. But I have a great peace about it that I would not have without the darkness.”

This thing almost jumped on a reporter’s head!

When you’re watching a Major League Baseball game you can probably assume that you’re not going to see any animals that could be household pets disrupting play. 

It’s just not something that should ever happen, right? 

Wrong! 

That’s exactly what happened Tuesday night during the Marlins-Red Sox spring training game in Florida as a loose cat ran on the field and almost jumped on a reporter’s head. 

Play was stopped as everyone watched this cat and wondered what it would do next. NESN’s Tom Caron, the reporter who almost had a cat land on his head, handled the report on the situation with pure class: 

Just another night at the ballpark.

What happens when a historically cash-strapped team starts spending like never before? We’re about to find out.

Major League Baseball had a problem. It was 1968, A’s owner Charlie Finley had just moved his team from Kansas City to Oakland, and Missouri Senator Stuart Symington was threatening to revoke the league’s antitrust exemption, the carve-out that allows the sport to operate as a legal monopoly. To placate Symington, baseball’s 20 owners agreed to create the Royals, plus three other teams.

Walter O’Malley, the Dodgers’ owner and the most powerful man in baseball, suggested that one franchise go to San Diego. It was a clever bit of maneuvering by him. O’Malley arranged for the Dodgers’ team president, Buzzie Bavasi, to become a part owner, thus freeing up Bavasi’s job for O’Malley’s son, Peter. And as a market, San Diego came with some competitive disadvantages; as Bavasi would later say, it was hemmed in by Mexico to the south, the desert to the east, the Pacific Ocean to the west and Vin Scully to the north. O’Malley was basically giving his own team a neighbor to torment a dozen or more times a year.

More often than not over the next half century, that’s exactly what happened. During the 1970s, while the Dodgers carried hefty payrolls and saw the results, the cash-strapped Padres once asked players to wait three days to deposit their checks. In ’74 the team needed a $71,000 advance from the city of San Diego. Finances were so dire in ’92 that the team did away with its lobby Christmas tree.

It has not been all bad for the Padres: They twice made the World Series, in 1984 and ’98, although they were quickly dispatched by superior teams. But mostly, they have dwelled in the reality that San Diego, which Nielsen categorizes as the No. 27 media market in the United States, cannot match the revenue, and therefore the payroll, of such heavyweights as Los Angeles (No. 2) and San Francisco (No. 6), or even Phoenix (No. 11) or Denver (No. 16), its divisional rivals. And for years, the Padres’ payrolls reflected that reality; a three-year sample from a decade ago: No. 29 in 2011, No. 27 in ’12 and No. 25 in ’13, according to Spotrac.

But in August 2012, a group including Peter Seidler bought the team for $800 million. Seidler, a two-time cancer survivor, was undergoing treatment at the time; when he felt healthy enough, in ’20, he took over as principal owner and chairman. Since that day, payrolls have looked like this: No. 8, No. 5 and, entering March, No. 4. Upon signing 30-year-old third baseman Manny Machado to an 11-year, $350 million extension in late February, San Diego became the first franchise in history to employ two $340 million players. The Padres’ coffers have swelled to the point that they have gone from receiving revenue sharing to contributing to it.

As the Dodgers swept the Padres in August, Seidler referred to his neighbors as “the dragon up the freeway that we’re trying to slay.” And his team finished the regular season behind L.A., as it has 45 times in 55 seasons and every year since 2010. But in October the Padres unsheathed their swords. For the first time in franchise history San Diego beat Los Angeles in the postseason, a stunning three-games-to-one Division Series upset. “I think they were tired of hearing about us,” says L.A. first baseman Max Muncy. “They were tired of losing to us. And they went out and absolutely hammered us.”

Seidler, 63, calls that moment the best of his time in San Diego. O’Malley’s punching bag finally punched back. And that punching bag is now owned by O’Malley’s grandson. “I love that irony,” says Seidler.

This is what fans say they want: an owner who is willing to push his team to the financial limit. The Padres stand on either the cusp of greatness or the cusp of disaster. If most or all of the massive deals they have made work out, the team could become a juggernaut. But if the big-money players falter, eventually someone will come for the Christmas tree.

Over their first three years, the Padres averaged 7,054 fans per game in their 50,000-seat ballpark. In his book Lords of the Realm: The Real History of Baseball, John Helyar describes a moment when Bavasi learned that a former player was on his way to ask for a loan: “Bavasi groaned and asked [Padres trainer Doc] Mattei where he might hide. ‘You might try the ticket windows,’ he said. ‘Nobody’s ever there.’ ”

It was a different story at the home of the Padres in February. As she wound through the right field concourse at Petco Park during FanFest, a Mister Softee vendor begged the crowd, packed in tight enough to draw ire from the fire marshal, to part. She inched forward, a step or two every few minutes. Finally she gave up, her vanilla-milkshake mix beginning to curdle in the San Diego sun, and took it all in.

Every Padres star attended the event, as did, it seemed, every fan who ever tuned into KWFM. The Padres maxed out FanFest—150,000 free tickets distributed; 48,000 people in attendance; the event extended an hour to accommodate the lines of people snaking around the ballpark—and capped season-ticket sales this winter at 24,000, all due to what they call “unprecedented demand.” Players had spent the previous day bopping around the city, making unannounced appearances. Ace Joe Musgrove played pickup basketball at the Monarch School, which educates unhoused kids. Closer Josh Hader tended bar at Bub’s. Left fielder Juan Soto laughed as he declined to hold a snake at a Petco store.

This is the scene Seidler says he envisioned as he began writing checks. Ten years and $300 million for Machado in 2019. Fourteen years and $340 million for right fielder Fernando Tatis Jr. in ’21. Five years and $100 million for Musgrove in August. Eleven years and $280 million for shortstop Xander Bogaerts in December. Six years and $108 million for righty Yu Darvish in February. That $350 million extension for Machado. The Padres also traded for Soto last year, taking on two and a half years at somewhere north of $50 million.

All owners say they want to win. Not all owners carry a projected luxury tax payroll above $270 million. (Perhaps relatedly, not all owners hear the crowd chant their name, as San Diegans did when Seidler took the stage for a Q&A session at FanFest.)

“There’s never been a major championship in this city, ever,” Seidler says. “We listen really carefully to our market, and what we believe that we heard is, If you give us something to support, boy, we will rise up. We will be there in force. . . . We thought, If we make aggressive moves, our community will respond equally aggressively. And it’ll make sense and it’ll help us win. And that’s what we’re seeing.”

Perhaps in part because of his family’s legacy—until Peter O’Malley, Seidler’s uncle, sold the Dodgers to News Corporation in March 1998, the family had owned the team for 48 years—Seidler tends to take the long view. He is especially fond of what the Padres call “statue contracts,” or deals that secure players for double-digit years, because he believes that consistency matters to the community. “The fans know that they’re going to be able to see a lot of these players to the end of their career,” he says. And he feels confident the team will be able to withstand those financial commitments. He likes to tell people, “The business of baseball is good.”

Some of his fellow owners do not appreciate Seidler’s spending spree. “[San Diego] puts a lot of pressure [on us],” Rockies owner Dick Monfort told The Denver Post in January, before his team opened spring training, a season after losing 94 games, with a projected $156 million payroll. “What the Padres are doing, I don’t 100% agree with, though I know our fans probably agree with it. We’ll see how it works out.”

To be sure, the Padres find themselves in an unusual situation: San Diego is the only city with an MLB club as its only men’s major professional sports team. It also boasts 1.4 million residents, many of whom harbor Los Abandonment issues: The NBA’s Clippers spent six years in San Diego in the 1970s and early ’80s before decamping for L.A., and the NFL’s Chargers broke even more hearts when they followed suit in 2017 after 56 seasons. This city is desperate for a winner to embrace, especially at the expense of its neighbor up the coast.

Still: Baseball teams make money. If they didn’t, their owners would sell them. So why doesn’t every so-called small market operate as the Padres do?

“I think they all can,” says Machado. “I think they all have the means for it, but ultimately it’s if they want to win. Peter’s shown the interest that he wants to win, and it’s showing.”

Monfort was surely speaking more from self-interest than from altruistic concern, but a note of caution is fair. Gigantic deals come with gigantic risk.

Seidler does not have to look far for evidence of the perils. The Padres first used the term “statue contract” when the team was negotiating with Tatis in early 2021. At the time, he was a budding superstar who ranked seventh among shortstops in outs above average, led all hitters in exit velocity and finished fourth in NL MVP voting. He was also a 22-year-old who had played less than a full season. A photo of him flipping his bat graced MLB: The Show 2021. The season after he signed the deal—the third-largest extension in major league history at the time—he finished second in the league in WAR and third in MVP voting. He was on track to be the most iconic Padre since Tony Gwynn.

But that winter, Tatis broke his left wrist in a motorcycle accident. He was on a rehab assignment at Double A San Antonio, days away from returning to the majors, when he was suspended for 80 games after testing positive for clostebol, an anabolic steroid. He initially claimed he had taken medication for ringworm he contracted while getting a haircut, then spoke more vaguely about a skin infection. San Diego officials and teammates publicly blasted his immaturity.

But that disappointment did not change the Padres’ attitude about long-term contracts—nor did it change their opinion of Tatis’s talent. According to someone familiar with the team’s thinking, executives only briefly considered trying to void his contract. (Player contracts bar dangerous activities such as riding motorcycles.) He’s still worth it, they decided. They intend to move him to right field when he returns after serving the 20 games remaining on his suspension.

Standing in his place at shortstop will be Bogaerts, who can still barely believe the contract he signed. He did “not at all” expect anyone to offer him 11 years, he says, but the Padres wanted him, and they wanted to separate themselves from his other suitors. They offered a similar deal to shortstop Trea Turner, who chose the Phillies, and were prepared to go even higher to right fielder Aaron Judge, who returned to the Yankees. Padres players checked their phones with glee all offseason, never knowing what general manager A.J. Preller’s next move might be.

Preller downplays the binge. “Even with the higher payroll number, we probably have the most flexibility we’ve had,” he says. Translation: Because the highest-paid players have mostly performed well, they are tradable in case of emergency.

And there might well be an emergency or two on the way: Soto is due to become a free agent in 2025. The Padres acquired him last summer after he rejected a 15-year, $440 million extension offer from the Nationals; a deal to keep him in San Diego would likely exceed $500 million. And just up the road in Anaheim, two-way superstar Shohei Ohtani is slated to be a free agent after this season. He might command even more. The Padres are thought to be in on both players.

Can this last forever? Will the Padres run out of money? No less an authority than commissioner Rob Manfred asked that question as spring training opened: “The trick for smaller markets has also always been sustainability,” he said. “Hats off to Peter Seidler. He’s made a massive financial commitment personally to making this all happen. The question [becomes]: How long can you continue to do that?”

Seidler says, “I don’t think I use the word sustainability. People do. . . . I know, as much as you can know these things, that we have everything we need to put a winning team on the field every single year.”

He declines to be specific about his finances, but he points out that he’s been a businessman for a long time: He opened his investment firm, Seidler Equity Partners, in 1992; it now manages some $3.5 billion in assets. Between his personal wealth and the furor around the team—the Padres have seen unprecedented demand for sponsorships in addition to tickets—he believes he can make the math work.

So far, Padres players are thrilled. “That’s how you’ve gotta be if you want to f—ing win,” says Musgrove, who grew up 20 minutes northeast of Petco Park and as a child watched a lot of f—ing losing. “You can’t compete with teams like the Mets and the Dodgers and the Yankees, who are going out and spending millions and millions, if you’re not [on that level]. You can go on runs like Cleveland did, but the realistic ability to be there year after year and compete for that spot—it’s tough to keep up.”

Which brings us back to the Dodgers. The Padres try not to make them too much of a focus, but “we know that we gotta go through them,” Machado says. And suddenly, they believe they can. Their lineup looks stronger than the Dodgers’, their rotation deeper, their bullpen more electric. And after last October, the Padres know what it takes.

“Knowing how to win is completely different than thinking you can win,” says Muncy. “They’re starting to learn that over there.”

Meanwhile, the Dodgers are paying the Padres the ultimate compliment: They acknowledged they have to go through them. L.A. officials last year were dismayed that the young, hungry Padres exuded more energy during that NLDS than the veteran Dodgers. L.A.’s shift toward prospects this year was, of all things, partly an attempt to keep up with San Diego. Walter O’Malley, what have you done?